Programme Accreditation
The accreditation of educational entities providing accredited or recognised further and/or higher courses is a legal requirement as per Subsidiary Legislation (SL) 607.03 ‘Further and Higher Education (Licensing, Accreditation and Quality Assurance) Regulations’. Courses are referred to as ‘accredited’ when they have been assessed by the MFHEA and pegged to the Malta Qualifications Framework. All education institutions interested in offering programmes of studies which are accredited and pegged to the Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF) need to submit their prospective programmes to the MFHEA for accreditation. The application form for Programme accreditation can be downloaded from the following link: Programme-Accreditation-Application-Form-V5.1docx (live.com). New entities, together with the submission of the application for programme accreditation, must also submit an application for Provider Accreditation.
The process of programme accreditation consists of initial vetting which is the first step of the process. Once the initial vetting is complete, one or more evaluators, depending on the type of programme, will be identified. The potential external evaluator/s that are asked to review the programme must have a qualification at an MQF Level higher than the programme. In cases where the external evaluator has a qualification at the same MQF Level, the evaluator must have a number of years of experience in the relevant subject. For programmes that are classified as ‘Award’, one evaluator will be engaged. For programmes classified as ‘Qualification’ from MQF 1 to MQF level 4, one evaluator will evaluate the programme. For programmes classified as ‘Qualification’ at MQF Level 5, two evaluators are to be engaged. For programmes classified as ‘Qualification’ at MQF Level 6, 7 and 8, three evaluators will be engaged given that a student will be acting as the third evaluator along with two professional experts in the field. Once the selected evaluator/s submit/s the evaluation report, the provider will be given a deadline by when to submit the updated application form in accordance with the recommendations highlighted within the evaluation report. This process can carry on for a maximum of three cycles until the programme fails or passes accreditation. This process also applies for the re-accreditation of already accredited programmes.
Irrespective of the MQF Level, whether a programme leads to an ‘Award’ or a ‘Qualification’ is determined by the ECTS weighting of the programme. Minimum number of credits for ‘Qualifications’ and parameters for ‘Awards’ can be found on page 56 of the Referencing Report (2016). The credit system is a central tool of the Bologna Process. This is a process in which the total hours of learning undertaken by a student translates into credits that are internationally recognised and transferable. In Malta, 1 credit is equivalent to 25 hours of total learning, 5 hours of which must be direct contact teaching hours. Thus, for a programme to be accredited and pegged to the Malta Qualifications Framework, it is important to remember that the duration of the course must be of a minimum of 25 hours of total learning. This is sub-divided into four sections:
(i) Contact Hours – tuition hours (these should amount to at least 20% of total learning hours, i.e. 5 hours per 1 ECTS);
(ii) Self-Study Hours – non-supervised learning hours;
(iii) Hands-On Hours – this refers to supervised learning;
(iv) Assessment Hours – this includes the number of hours spent working on an assignment as well as/or the hours the students spend during examinations.
The Referencing Report (2016) provides guidelines to the criteria used by the MFHEA to determine the appropriateness of the application.
When designing your course on your programme application, your programme developer should ensure that the course’s learning outcomes are in line with MQF Level descriptors found in the Referencing Report (pages 77–79).
For further information with regards to the programme application, please refer to the referencing report (2016).
A copy of the application form, together with the required documentation, is to be sent to [email protected].
The current fee structure can be downloaded from the following link: Administrative Fee Structure for Accreditation and Licensing of Providers and Programmes – Malta Further & Higher Education Authority (mfhea.mt).
A Flowchart showing the process for Programme Accreditation.
Flowchart B: The process of Programme Accreditation
(1) Application for Programme Accreditation is received
Application for Programme Accreditation is received at MFHEA.
(2) Acknowledgement is sent
Acknowledgement is sent within approx. 10 working days.
(3) Issuing of Invoice/s
Once it is confirmed that the application is filled in as requested, an invoice will be issued and sent to the provider within approx. two working weeks.
(4) Proof of Payment
Proof of Payment needs to be submitted to MFHEA.
(5) Confirmation of Payment
Once payment is confirmed from the Corporate Unit within MFHEA, the Licensing and Accreditation Unit will start the accreditation process. An official receipt will be sent by MFHEA within a month.
If at any point in the application process, no feedback, requested documents, amendments or clarifications are provided by the providers for a period of three months, then the application will be considered null and void, and the applicant will need to re-submit a new application.
(6) Administration Process
The duration of this stage is contingent upon the administration process. The program timeline commences once payment has been submitted and an officer is assigned to the program.
(7) Initial Vetting
The MFHEA Officer conducts the initial vetting of the program application. Applicants will receive feedback from the officer.
For Awards the estimated duration for this stage is 50days.
For Qualifications the estimated duration for this stage is 75 days.
(8) Allocating Evaluators
For programs categorized as Awards, the MFHEA Officer will appoint one Expert Evaluator to evaluate the program. This process may take up to 20 days.
For programs categorized as Qualifications (MQF level 5 – MQF Level 8), the MFHEA officer will assemble an evaluation panel consisting of two expert evaluators and one student evaluator. This process may take up to 20 days.
The Quality Assurance Committee is required to approve the proposed Evaluating Panel.
Kindly note that if the QAC does not approve the proposed Evaluator Panel, then the MFHEA Officer will need to restart the process of allocating an evaluator.
(8.1) Approval from the Provider
The MFHEA Officer must inform the provider of the proposed Expert Evaluator/Evaluating Panel. The Provider is required to provide feedback within three days.
If the provider objects to the evaluator/evaluation panel, then the officer is obligated to inform the QAC of the provider’s objection. If the QAC accepts the provider’s objections, then the MFHEA officer will inform all parties of the outcome and restart the process explained in Stage three. If the QAC does not approve the objections raised by the provider, the MFHEA Officer will inform all parties of the QAC decision and commence Stage 4.
(9) Evaluation Cycle
For programmes categorised as Awards – The evaluator will have a 20-day timeframe to produce the evaluation report. The provider will be given a 20-day period to revise the program application based on the evaluator’s report.
For Programmes categorised as Qualifications – The Evaluating Panel will have 40 days to produce a consolidated report. The provider will be given 40 days to revise the program application based on the evaluator’s report.
(10.1) Successful completion of the accreditation process
Upon successful completion of the accreditation process, the provider is required to submit the certificate template within 10 days.
(10.2) Unsuccessful completion of the accreditation process
Upon unsuccessful completion of the accreditation process, the provider will be informed of the panel’s final recommendation. Additionally, they will be notified that the Quality Assurance Committee (QAC) and the MFHEA Board will make the ultimate decision regarding accreditation status.
Should the QAC determine that the program is not accredited, the provider will be advised of the appeals procedure.
Disclaimers
- The duration included only counts working days.
- Kindly be advised that the specified timeframe may be subject to change during the summer months, from mid-June to the end of September, due to the Malta Further and Higher Education Authority (MFHEA) operating under summer hours.
- Extensions: The MFHEA accommodates extension requests on the condition that the provider submits a formal email detailing the rationale to the designated MFHEA officer overseeing the program. It’s important to understand that granting extensions will inevitably lengthen the accreditation process for the program.